VC
The Modern Art Museum of Fort Worth responded to controversy over Sally Mann photographs that some claimed were ‘child porn.’
Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.
To use social login you have to agree with the storage and handling of your data by this website. Privacy Policy
AcceptHere you'll find all collections you've created before.
It is child porn.
Maybe not applicable in this instance but I’m using the term “child sexual abuse images” now. In the last week someone mentioned using the term “p*rn” gave it a legitimacy and was almost like the person could agree.
I mean “not applicable” to what I said by the way not you – as I’m referring to actual images like photos …but then…these are images imagined or otherwise and still pornographic and wrong. Me having this opinion let’s people like this get away with it and still provide these images to their audience legally. Call it art all you want. It isn’t. We see you.
Had to search for her photos, they are grotesque and inexcusable. The poor children look so jaded and in peril.
Same. Her photos are degenerate garbage. Its straight child p0rn. Satanists often hide in plain sight. I pray for the children. Its absolute depravity.
I looked up her “work” and it is completely disturbing. The children in the photos are never smiling. They have dark circles under their eyes, some so bad it looks like a they have black eyes. Some posing with unlit cigarettes (like, why?) The way she photographs even the older children completely nude is so creepy. She takes images of them sleeping together nude in such a way it looks like a group sex activity. If I were to take pictures of my own children, using her “style” and post them online the police would be kicking my door down. But I would never do such a thing, because I love my kids and would never want them to be gawked at and slobbered over by a bunch of pdos. She defends her actions by claiming the photos are innocent. But she knows good and well there are weirdos out there who will use her art as masturbatory aids. The fact that she knows this and continues to produce this material reveals her black heart. The looks on the kids’ faces in every single photo says it all. What will happen when they are adults and they realize their naked bodies have been on display for the whole world to see? How will they feel? My daughter literally said to me a few months ago “Mom, I’m so glad you don’t have social media and don’t post embarrassing pictures of me for everyone to see.” Out of the mouths of babes…
I’ve read that black eyes in children (in this abuse / occult context) is caused by being an*lly raped, or perhaps if young enough just v*ginally raped, causing the eyes to bulge and blood vessels to burst. Apparently, images of pandas are associated with this unspeakably horrific abuse. Sounds like this may possibly be relevant in this person’s “art.”
Jesus, have mercy! Blessed Mother Mary, pray for us and all children!
I tried to post an article about this a few weeks ago but was denied, and believed it was due to the terms of this site not allowing anything related to child p*rnography. Funny how that changes according who posts. News is news no matter how uncomfortable it makes you or who submits the post.
In 2015 there’s an article where she talks about her work (oeuvre), and basically says children aren’t as innocent as we think they are.
No lady…they are…you are just projecting a normalization of pedophilia.
And there’s a couple of one-eye signs in the mix too.
disgusting
Smh