rick
13 Votes
I agree, it is homoerotic. Even the eye lashes scream GAY. This is a subliminal attempt to acclimate the collective conscious toward blasphemy.
Do not be fooled.
Companion article:
Easter poster depicting a handsome, fresh-faced Jesus prompts criticism in Spain
Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.
To use social login you have to agree with the storage and handling of your data by this website. Privacy Policy
AcceptHere you'll find all collections you've created before.
I agree.
It’s an attempt to mislead the unwary. Not just homosexuals, but women too into sexualizing Christ. Yet another way of desacralizing the image, kingship and action of Him.
The emphasis is on the beauty of the body. The wounds that are Christ’s distinguishing marks and proof of his sacrifice are barely visible, barely brought to the fore, as the painter did them just because he had to.
And this “crown” looks more like something out of a Beyoncé concert than anything else, a far cry from the divine and the halo of holiness that accompanies saintly figures.
Christ is: Royalty (God’s), Love (for mankind
) and Sacrifice (for the since of humanity). We don’t have any of that here.
He’s also very white!
This Ra**st religion as a whole is fake! it’s actually a good thing to desacralize the whole thing.
That’s what concerns you?? They are pushing faggotry to destroy families and sexualizing the spiritual to destroy souls so they can enslave humanity on all levels and create suffering to feed off of and reign over you and everyone but you’re most concerned over skin tone, he’s too light in your opinion, even though you do not believe in him. Are you listening to yourself? What tribe are you from?
Nicely said marie
Well P3do priests have been pushing fag*otry since day 1!
You want to fight enslavement, start by boycotting everything in dollar stores, and supermarket that’s made in poor countries, and only buy local!
It needs 2 for a tango dance, you think you’re on the good side fighting evil, when in fact you’re just on the opposite side of the left! You’re also part of evil @marie! just a pawn!
So the devil cannot infiltrate the church like Klaus from the WEF infiltrates government? Just because priests have defiled children does not mean the spirit of the church is questionable. Unfortunately, the devil lurks and just as it has successfully defiled priests, so to has it defiled the general population.
We will deprogram you slowly but surely.
They are also pushing homosexuality to halt reproduction because you know, gotta meet the Georgia guidstone’s population goal.
Nevermind it’s obvious you get your education from Netflix
There is irony in your racist comment Geronimo; please do tell us when you met Jesus? What did he look like? ? Geronimo eh?…a name has meaning and significance… is a sun dance linked the true religion?
Take your focus away from racism. This war is beyond skin tone. Do not get stuck in racism. By you focusing on his race or skin tone, that makes you a practicing racist.
Fire does not extinguish fire.
I think you’re right about everything you said here.
You are actually right. Wow. Great catch. Its a subliminal within a subliminal. They have undermined his passion and instead focused on vanity. They are barely there. Why? It is an insult to his sacrifice for humanity.
This guy also has a sick obsession for naked kids. It’s enough to take a look at his art. He is definitely sexualizing children and, in this case, Christ.
Makes sense why he incorporated homoeroticism. They go hand in hand with child abuse.
Absolutely!
This AI dude (?) couldn’t fight his way out of a fucking cereal box. Where are our alpha males?
I laughed at the image you created here Sharine ?
You can find them at your local feminist rally or pride parade Sharine! ?
All I see is a feminine Jesus depiction like 98% of Jesus art in history. They were almost all feminine like this. But homoerotic? There is nothing erotic in this picture, it’s artistic nudity at best. It’s not different than all the disgusting sissyfied, emasculated Jesus portrayals made by famous artists through history. Even the shape of the beard points to referencing an old Jesus art that looked feminine just like this.
Nearly all Jesus art should prompt criticism for being androgynous. But on this particular piece there is nothing erotic. It’s feminine but not erotic.
Wow. May I offer you some visine for your blurry vision?
I am far from being religious or such but this is repulsive.
This related image series was at the top of my reddit feed from /r/weirddalle
2
Here’s one from the front page of Leonardo AI y’all might like.