rick
Recently, scientists have used a new x-ray technique to date the Shroud of Turin to arouns the time of Jesus Christ some 2000 years ago.
This new finding disproves the findings in the 1980’s debuking the shroud being from the middle ages.
From the article:
—
Also known as the Holy Shroud, it bears a faint image of the front and back of a bearded man, which many believers is Jesus’ body miraculously imprinted onto the fabric.
But research in the 1980s appeared to debunk the idea it was real after dating it to the Middle Ages, hundreds of years after Christ’s death.
Now, Italian researchers who used a new technique involving x-rays to date the material have confirmed it was manufactured around the time of Jesus about 2,000 years ago.
—
Things are starting to get a but interesting in the invisible war between Good and evil.
Link:
It points to being real. Also, how does a dead body imprint on a sheet wrap or does it only imprint on a white sheet?
I believe the print is from radiation. In Buddhism they call this ‘the rainbow body’ the radiation of divine light.
They may of course call it that. Even false doctrines can be correct about some things.
Why is Buddhism false doctrine? If anything its teachings strengthen and validate Christianity?
Only by contrast, Simon.
Like a burned in image.
@rick
Yes, actually burned in a way. It is a produced negative image (like photography) from exposure of silver nitrate brushed onto the shroud, and then exposed to sunlight; the compound was rolled over the body of a middle aged Hungarian that underwent his own “passion” death as a form of devotion. The compound then darkened to produce a negative when it was exposed to sunlight. This is one of the early processes used in modern photography.
Silver Nitrate and its effects upon light were known almost certainly since ancient times. They were, however, known commonly in medieval Europe after Albertus Magnus, a German Lick friar, documented its chemical existence in the 1200s. The shroud appears about 150 years after this.
@444gem
How do you know that the man was Hungarian? That’s oddly specific.
Satan can even turn himself into an angel of light. This is luciferians making it up. Read my comment posted below please. Thanks.
Not buying it, they pushed this everywhere for a reason I think I saw 4 or 5 different links about it in 2 hours. First of all there’s no way to know who the body was, several people would get killed this way it wasn’t some bizarre choice. Second I don’t trust them, they’re blasting all the old uninhabited sites where people do not even live in Palestine and around the world in “wars” for a reason, to make it impossible to look into anything. The truth is being wiped away as fast as they can wipe, and the real question is, why? What truths are they desperate to hide?
It is NOT Jesus. Jist bear it in mind. For a long time it was under custody of visconti sforza satanist noble italian family, the same which had the first tarot of the latest centuries compiled and customized with the faces of the members of te family. This shroud is a lie being built for a long time. Jesus was NPT long haired. The Bible is clear about long hair being a shame for a man and God would never allow His son to figure naked printed somewhere. If jesus wanted to be depicted he would have been clear about it
This is just like any babylonian scum (babylon means confusion), sometimes they say it’s true, sometime false and people put heir hope on a piece of cloth. Instead of travelling miles paying a huge price to see shroud of turin, oviedo or manopello’s veil, in case you have money spend on yourself, your family and people in need.
I meant babylonian SCAM
People in need: I was hungy and you fed me, was cold and you clothed me, was in jail and you visisted me. Etc…. it is his own words.
Why the sudden obsession with this? It’s everywhere all of a sudden, which means it needs to be ignored.
It is an MK trigger. Another one for people to believe in the fake Messiah in the future through brainwash and mind control but people won’t believe this. Time and again this surfaces in the media. It is just sinister and grim like the manopello veil. There is nothing holy or beautiful in it. Jesus ressurrected inglorious body leaving NO marks on any sheet.
“In glorious”
This study they’re pushing uses a methodology of X-Ray scattering on samples of the cellulose structure to determine the supposed age of the shroud. They makes a huge, and likely erroneous assumption: That the shroud was stored at a stable temperature of ~72.5 degrees and 55% humidity prior to its sudden appearance in France in the 1350s, more than 1000 years after the Roman empire fell. If the temperatures and/or humidities were even slightly different, say 73 degrees and 56% humidity, or the storage was not in very stable conditions (typically so unless it stayed underground in a cave for the entire period), then the dating of the fabric is subject to being wildly different, as much as a range of 1200 years.
Even accepting their oddly exaact assumptions of 72.5 degrees and 55% humidity, which wreaks of fine tuning the assumptive data to achieve a desired result for the age, and that their analysis of X-Ray scattering for cellulose is fully correct (which both climatological, and alternate data suggests it isn’t, as their isn’t sufficient reference data on this methodology), the study would only offer some evidence that the yarn used to make the cloth itself originates from plants harvested sometime within several decades after the period in Yeshua died. It does not show that the imprint was made at that date, and the test does nothing to date the the staining of the fabric itself.
Carbon-14 dating avoids these issues, and multiple blind tests have determined the cloth to originate sometime around 1300 CE, exactly when it appeared in the historical record as a way to make money from the pilgrimage economy of Catholic Europe. It still to this day, is used to harvest huge quantities of donations to the Cattle Church…