lgageharleya
“Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman, a Democrat, raised eyebrows with his choppy Senate Banking Committee hearing questioning on Tuesday.”
If you listen to the video (which is difficult) you will realize that he is the last questioner pursuing a very valid line of inquiry most of us should be concerned about (and many are) but his implants and other mind control tells are tripping him up in a way that not only makes him appear ludicrous, but that feeling then becomes associated with this particular topic. The men responding don’t feel the need to even elaborate, at one point, the response is simply, “Senator, I don’t believe that’s the case” and there is nothing more forthcoming.
Edit: (Breakdown for any unfamiliar):
This senator (who has been known for the giant, odd-shaped lump protruding from the back of his neck and his semicoherency) is the last questioner in a recent hearing about bailing out failed banks.
He has not long since been in for hospitalized treatment for ‘clinical depression’ and ‘lightheadeness’ and has only recently returned to the senate job he was not capable of doing, yet “his office was maintaining” while he was incapacitated (to include voting in his stead.) He was ill enough for extended hospitalization, but not so ill that he purportedly wasn’t voting and continuing on, as per business and we must all pretend this is legitimate.
His questions on this banking bailout are valid and necessary, but having him – the last questioner, as well as a garbling, slurring and trailing off into nonsensical gibberish on a national stage – makes a mockery of the people’s need to ask and right to know. It makes him, the only one asking these things, look like the Frankenstein monster. It makes the questions seem ridiculous by comparison and association to the inanity of how he is struggling to ask.
The sentence has to be rephrased so the idea can be conveyed more clearly.
exactly, if you meant the Headline.
Made me wonder if I was chipped trying to read that!
Which sentence, John, Fetterman’s or mine?
Tried to clarify it for you both.
so how is his office allowed to vote in his stead? unelected aides are voting on legislation?
There is some debate as to whether votes were cast on his behalf, I’d have to go search out that info at the source, which I’m not that invested in doing. But literally every other action being taken in his name isn’t even in question, the only question as to those is his competency vs whether someone else is acting independently, and all we’re getting on that front is disinformation, no information at all and outright lies.
“Since Mr. Fetterman checked in to the hospital, he has co-sponsored a bipartisan bill designed to help prevent future train derailment disasters, opened new district offices across Pennsylvania and hired four new staff members. On Wednesday, Mr. Fetterman sent a letter to the agriculture secretary, pressing the administration to deploy resources to the site of the train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio, to help farmers concerned about chemical release threatening the viability of their farms and livestock. East Palestine is near the Pennsylvania border.
“Meetings with constituent groups have continued as usual, albeit without the traditional few minutes of glad-handing by the senator at the end. But in the Senate, a staff-run institution even in the best of times, that is hardly atypical.
“It is not unusual for lawmakers to be told by members of their staff, sometimes after the fact, what bills they are co-sponsoring. With the exception of calls to cabinet officials or meetings with the chief executives of companies that are important to their states, there are few meetings that cannot be handled by senior staff.
“Any lobbyist will tell you that if you get as high as the chief of staff, and that chief makes a promise to you that the senator will do something, that will be accepted,” said Ross Baker, professor of political science at Rutgers University and a former aide to Senator Harry Reid, Democrat of Nevada. “It will be as if the senator himself gave the OK.”
nytimes.com/2023/03/09/us/politics/fetterman-senate-walter-reed.html
This article shows that a journalist attempted to question Fetterman’s chief of staff via Twitter about the voting and introducing legislation while hospitalized for psychiatric care and the c.o.s. blocked him without answering:
redstate.com/nick-arama/2023/03/02/chief-of-staff-gives-bad-response-when-asked-how-fetterman-is-introducing-legislation-while-in-hospital-n710595
This article has been taken down, but you can still see the opening as part of the search results:
“John Fetterman sponsored a bill from the hospital. Here’s what he …
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/john…
WebMar 7, 2023 · The not-so-secret reality of Congress is that a significant amount of work is handled by aides, who negotiate with other staffers, funnel information to their bosses, and rely on the elected…”
Here is more info about the circumstances leading to his hospitalization and the absolute void of curiosity from anyone in the media to ask a single question:
billingsreport.com/who-is-impersonating-john-fetterman-and-signing-his-name-on-letters/
This asks some pertinent questions:
townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2023/03/26/oh-by-the-way-john-fettermans-hospitalization-was-extended-for-another-two-weeks-n2621142
This shows an ongoing history of cognitive impairment following his stroke, which happened during his campaigning days:
msn.com/en-us/health/other/media-still-ignore-unanswered-questions-about-sen-john-fetterman-s-health/ar-AA17ugmy
“In one of the rare instances when an actual reporter got access to Fetterman, the report wasn’t good. Per NBC’s Dasha Burns:
“Because of his stroke Fetterman’s campaign required closed captioning technology for this interview to essentially read our questions, as we asked them in small talk before the interview without captioning, it wasn’t clear he was understanding our conversation,” she reported on Oct. 11.
Burns was promptly eviscerated for simply telling the truth.”