in

Yesterday Elon was asked about letting Alex Jones back on Twitter…Check out his response….

Musk now quoting the Gospel of Mathew …Mabey he is the anti Christ…Just an odd response imo.

What do you think?

22 Points
Upvote Downvote
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

81 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
romanschapter9
romanschapter9
2 months ago

who does he think he is?

444Gem
444Gem
2 months ago
Reply to  romanschapter9

He is using mistranslated a quote of Yeshua, to say that “Jones, who is a child, should come kiss the ring for I am the antiXristos.” He is also insinuating Jones is a pedophile.

Another Soli Man usurping The Truth in his audition for Lucifer.

MoreTrollsToStop
MoreTrollsToStop
2 months ago
Reply to  444Gem

Thanks again 444Gem. I am looking at the sky and saw it looked like a storm was coming. Times are coming closer and closer.

Steven Casteel
Steven Casteel
2 months ago

Any minute now Q / Jesus / Trump / Obama / Aliens / The Andromedans / AI are gonna save us! /s

Steven Casteel
Steven Casteel
2 months ago
Reply to  444Gem

“Yeshua”

You don’t get to act all high and mighty / self-rightous as if your religious texts aren’t also tainted with ancient bloodline and Jew manipulation even if your heart is in the right place, unlike Mr. Luciferian here.

444Gem
444Gem
2 months ago
Reply to  Steven Casteel

Steven, I am simply speaking The Truth. Nothing more is found within my words.

What you know as a “Jew,” is a misnomer catch all termed used to lump three very different groups together so as to confuse and usurp identity. Those three groups, basically are:

1. The Isis-Ra-Elis. They were the slaves in Northern Egypt that left with the Aryeh Yehudah after Thera erupted in 1560 BCE.

2. The PHEONICIANS – FANAKIANS – ANAKS who are the “Jews,” that so many have correctly identified as the serpent seed wreaking havoc on the world: to name a few more well known: George Soros, Bill Gates, Zuckerberg, and the R0th$ch1lds. However, all of the Nasis, like H1tl3r, The president of Isis-Ra-El and Musk, are also of this group, hiding in plain sight. They are Phar I See, Fire I Sees, Luciferians that worship light. They are imposters.

3. The Aryeh Yehudah. Yeshua was an Aryeh Yehudah, as David, as Peter, as Moses. The scriptures as handed down have some tainting, yet these twistings are more revelatory than one can imagine, if only you know how to read them with God in your heart.

I have seen you come far on your journey towards God and The Truth since you began here. Now it is time to relinquish the coldness and hate you have buried within.

Maciej
Maciej
2 months ago
Reply to  444Gem

Hi 444Gem,
Recently i am having a moral dilemma. As a person who eats very healthy and most of my food comes from my own garden i am struggling with something. What scriptures says about eating meat and fish? I eat lots of vegetables, fruits and spices but i do eat meat as well. Not this supermarket meat on s******s but from a farmer. Enough to say, i don’t like the idea of killing a live organism to get the food but sometimes it’s stronger than me and i need to eat chicken, beef, turkey etc. And lots of fish. Obviously i am not killing it by myself simply because i can’t take a life away. Especially animals life. Could you please help me with this and perhaps point me a direction regarding this matter? Thank you very much as always

444Gem
444Gem
2 months ago
Reply to  Maciej

Allow me the time to respond after proper consideration

Maciej
Maciej
2 months ago
Reply to  444Gem

It wasn’t me who gave you this stupid minus. Ehh… society.

Anon
Anon
2 months ago
Reply to  Maciej

I am not 444gem but here is some of what Scriptures say:

“Every moving thing that lives shall be food for you. And as I gave you the green plants, I give you everything. But you shall not eat flesh with its life, that is, its blood.”
‭‭Genesis‬ ‭9‬:‭3‬-‭4‬

“Eat whatever is sold in the meat market without raising any question on the ground of conscience. For “the earth is the Lord’s, and the fullness thereof.”… So, whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God.”
‭‭1 Corinthians‬ ‭10‬:‭25‬-‭26‬, ‭31‬ ‭ESV‬‬

I believe the Scriptures are clear eating meat is okay. I believe we should be respectful to animals, but eating them has been allowed to us. If you personally think eating meat is wrong, then for you it is wrong, because that makes it sin (different people have different convictions). Doing what you think is wrong, is wrong (Romans 14).

Michelle
Michelle
2 months ago
Reply to  Maciej

Not that person, but follow your heart. I was ignoring mine until the Lord started giving me dreams showing as I do unto them, I do unto myself. Blessings to you.

matt
matt
2 months ago
Reply to  Maciej

you guys are treating this gem guy like a prophet, hes just some random person you dont know on the internet, dont take everything he says as truth, him saying ‘I am simply speaking The Truth. Nothing more is found within my words.’

like this guy is clearly high on himself

Airplane Clouds
Airplane Clouds
2 months ago
Reply to  matt

I agree with you Matt!
Cheers!!

444Gem
444Gem
2 months ago
Reply to  matt

If you wish to see if I speak The Truth, do not take my word for it. Do your own research on what I have said, and ask YHWH for the guidance.

Critical thinking for oneself, through God, is the most important thing we must all learn to do.

Airplane Clouds
Airplane Clouds
2 months ago
Reply to  444Gem

YHVH, JHVH, Jahvey, Jahweh, Jehovah, Wahvey, YHVH, Yahve, Yahveh, Yahwe, Yahweh or just simply God.

Why did God create such a complex list of Labels???
Why did he decide to change it to: God?

444Gem
444Gem
2 months ago

The simplest answer is that Gad did create such a complex list of names. Gad is not who you think, however.

The name of YHWH has much to do with the writing in the glyphs of the Alef Bet, and yet the True pronounciation is simply “Why?” Yeshua said “may the first be last and the last be first.” HWHY is “Hu-Why?”

The True name of YHWH is said, U-A-I-E the first word uttered by humanity, and the basic vowels which extend from the top of the mouth down to the bottom of the throat. It is the question that answers itself, as YHWH spoke the universe into existence. The word is so very important.

Now let us return to the question of the name God in English. It’s use comes directly from Phoenician-Canaanite Serpent Seed, from the epithet for Lucifer “GoD/GaD” written גד. It refers to “divine” favor or fortune. But from who? From EL (Satanas/Saturnas) who is also called Elyon, said “Elon.” Look to Isiah 65:11.

“But as for you who forsake the LORD and forget my holy mountain, who spread a table for FORTUNE and fill bowls of mixed wine for Destiny.”

The Original word for FORTUNE in this passage is GoD גד and destiny is MeNi. Both are Phoenician avatars of Lucifer/EL/Saturnas. It refers specifically to blood sacrifices performed to satiate Lucifer and his many forms by the serpent seed, whose priests were deceiving the Isis-Ra-Elis into abandoning YHWH for Lucifer, who masquerades as YHWH under the name Gad/God. Read in the original right to left, it is DoG, which encodes the meaning of the Dog Star Sirius, and the CANINE-ites who are his servant.

Yeshua said “do not give what is holy to DOGS,” the word for Dogs in the original Greek is κυσιν Which is KUSHITE, the Egyptian-Phoenicians that worship Sirius the Dog Star. YHWH in his infinite wisdom gave us scriptures that readily reveal this Truth, no matter how much they try to twist it; what they try to hide only reveals more.

Your language, English is purposefully encoded so that we call YHWH by the name of Lucifer’s fortune, and do not even realise. The cushite CANINE PHEONICIANS have long controlled Britain. First many thousands of years ago through those called “Scots,” then as VENICIAN bankers “black nobility,” and now as the “House of Wind-Sor.” Wind-Sor means “the Winding of the SAROS,” which is Us-Sarus/Osiris who was said to incarnate as the APIs Bull. The breath of Osiris is what these Dogs name mean, while they parade around in all their splendor as Soli-Men in castles made of golden sand.

These Phoenician serpents have ensured through repetition, they are called Tannaim which means repeaters and sea beast, that the English language encodes all of their meanings to usurp YHWH and Yeshua in name and to enslave the people. The power of the word cannot be underestimated.

Why then do I use God sometimes? Because in principle it is the English word that associates to YHWH within your psyche, and thus I use it in juxtaposition to invite you to ask this question and find The Truth if you so desire.

444Gem
444Gem
2 months ago
Reply to  444Gem

For further reading:

religionofancientpalestine.com/?p=488

B17F5EC8-DDA6-457E-97ED-D35E45155AC8.jpeg
SoAnnoyed
SoAnnoyed
2 months ago
Reply to  444Gem

You seem to have gathered some impressive knowledge in gematria and other fields.
I have much respect for those who devote themselves to understanding their world.

May i ask you:
Do you agree that once critical research is done, one’s interpretation and conjectures/theories can still taint the information revealed from the critical research?

Because theories are just unproved assertions that need validation right?

So, what can validate apart from a physical proof (visible evidence we all naturally agree on) or through science?

Also, if the sources used for critical research are not proven to be 100% untouched/verified: do you ponderate the results?

If not, can assertions drawn from such sources (proven to have been touched) still be objectively and logically labelled “truth”?

Vievie
Vievie
2 months ago
Reply to  matt

I think people appreciate 444gem because of the extremely thorough research and thought put into their posts, and generosity with their time and contributions.

Anyway, if there are forum members who appreciate and value their input, what’s it to you?

I wish more members were as thorough, well educated, and positive.

444Gem
444Gem
2 months ago
Reply to  Vievie

Thank you for the kind words Vievie

bellacatania
bellacatania
2 months ago
Reply to  444Gem

I learned a lot from you 444Gem, a huge thank you. I discovered Vigilantlinks by coincidence and it’s quite recent. Before VL, and other than VL, do you have older, or other articles, contributions, in other websites.
Are you also active in other plateforms, websites?

444Gem
444Gem
2 months ago
Reply to  bellacatania

@Bellacatania

Thank you for seeking The Truth, YHWH bless you. For the time being, I have only written here under the thirteen monkeys series. Eventually, I will offer paper writings for readers.

jerrycan
jerrycan
2 months ago
Reply to  444Gem

Which references do you recommend for studying gematria?

444Gem
444Gem
2 months ago
Reply to  jerrycan

You can use many of the resources linked in the thirteen monkeys series.

The book linked at the end of chapter IX is The Computation of 666.

5216E317-93EE-4DE8-BE10-FCEA98CA2A35.jpeg
Allonzikoi
Allonzikoi
2 months ago
Reply to  Vievie

Vievie, the thing is nobody can pretend to speak the truth, this is incredibly pretentious. You can spend your life researching, you’ll never know the truth. Maybe some truths but not the truth. I appreciate the huge efforts of his posts but I remain critical.

444Gem
444Gem
2 months ago
Reply to  Allonzikoi

As humans, we cannot comprehend even the nail of the little of YHWH. We can only knock at the door and ask.

I understand that in English The Truth may imply ALL The Truth, but that is not what I am saying. If I say, Trees need sunlight to grow naturally, it is The Truth. That does not mean sunlight is ALL they need to grow, as water, soil, and air are also necessary components. The difference is substantial.

I greatly appreciate your desire to remain critical and think for yourself, through YHWH, for that is the most necessary skill for surviving in this times of tribulation.

444Gem
444Gem
2 months ago
Reply to  444Gem

The nail of the little finger*

hollow logs
hollow logs
2 months ago
Reply to  matt

he might not be a prophet, but he certainly has studied the ancient prophets & prophecies. & without equal on this site in regards to decoding symbolism. & there are several on here, myself included, who have studied ancient texts in one regard or another.. ( fleur.. delete.. criss.. VC of course..) this is a rare forum from which one can extract great meaning & knowledge.. rare these days as we all know. & we are all striving to know more.. every day adding to the compendium. very much appreciate 444.. turns the other cheek time & time again

kittyvac
kittyvac
2 months ago
Reply to  444Gem

Hi 444Gem 🙂 I was reading on a Christian website that the Ashkenazi are actually from a place that was called Khazar, not Israel. I tried to post it here but VC declined it. I have also tried to look into the Aryeh Yehuda but information is hard to find on the Web. I read that it means the Lion of the Tribe of Judah, Judah being one of the 12 tribes of Israel and a son of Jacob. Jesus/Yeshua is descended from him. Also what is the truth regarding the Black Hebrew Israelite movement? Apologies if you have already covered this.

444Gem
444Gem
2 months ago
Reply to  kittyvac

Hi Kitty,

Most of the Ashkenazi are an offshoot branch of descendants from the Isis-Ra-Elis; the vast majority are descended for a genetic founder population of 4 European Gentile women. Their Rabbis know full well that they take their name fro “Ashkenaz,” who is descended from Japheth and not Shem, and is not from the Abraham line. However they do have some male descendsnct from the Aryeh Yehudah through intermixing with Isis Ra Elis in the early Middle Ages.

Look to John 4:11 where a Samaritan woman asks Yeshua if he is greater than “father Yakov.” Yeshua explains that his living water (God’s Truth) shall never leave one thirsty unlike Yakov. Yakov itself means “The usurper,” and “One who bites/holes the heel.” This is in reference to being a twin, an imposter a double.

Yakov is also the one who wrestled with EL, that is the I AM in his pineal gland while dreaming, and asked for his blessing. There is much untangling to do that requires reading the original Hebrew to understand and see. Indeed, there is little information on us as the serpents, who follow in Ma’at (what is written is true…) have tried to blot us from history and to usurp our identities. See the removal of names of the Hyksos kings from Cushitic MIZRAim (Egyptian) records, and the references to the “Children of Elohim” in the scriptures to start.

You can also find information by looking at Sepharads (Which means Shepherds, although you’ll have to search for the earliest sepharads after the temple destruction in 69, and not the later North African Converts that now call themselves that) and the murals on graves at Beni Hasan, which means “Son of Gods Voice.”

One more clue, look to the 13th Noma of Egypt, where a specific type of Amphora (The Type Yeshua’s used to turn water into wine) bears our name.

SoAnnoyed
SoAnnoyed
2 months ago
Reply to  444Gem

Is Nobody suprised to read that G-d could physically wrestle with one of his creature?

Why would the Father come on earth, within His creation, with a physical body to wrestle with one of his prophet when he could have just destroyed him with a mere “be and so it was”; like needed for the creation?

I wonder who was in charge of the universe while He supposedly played the sumo in the middle of the desert..?

This cannot be my conception of an All powerful and supremely intelligent Creator.

Now let me wrestle with the chair i just designed. I’ll be right back.

444Gem
444Gem
2 months ago
Reply to  SoAnnoyed

It was not YHWH that wrestled with Yakov. Why would a descendant of the covenant of Abraham, need to ask YHWH for his blessing and his name? It was EL who wrestled with Yakov, Satanas/Saturnas, within his Pineal Gland. The scriptures say “and so Yakov named the place Pineal.” The interpretations given of the scripture are based purely on horrible translation and usurpation by the very descendants of Yakov, the usurper.

This story of wrestling with Lucifer is retold in many Luciferian mythologies throughout the ages, such as that of Milo.

SoAnnoyed
SoAnnoyed
2 months ago
Reply to  444Gem

According to you, Jacob fought with the devil and is an imposter?

444Gem
444Gem
2 months ago
Reply to  SoAnnoyed

What does the name Yakov mean? What is the word in the Hebrew and Septaguint scriptures used for “GoD?”

A E
A E
2 months ago
Reply to  444Gem

From verywellfamily:
Jacob comes from the Old Testament and means “supplanter,” which is often interpreted as someone who seizes, circumvents, or usurps. 

In the book of Genesis, the twins Jacob and Esau were born to Isaac and Rebecca; Esau came first, making him the first-born son. When Jacob was born he was holding onto Esau’s heel. This foreshadows two future Biblical events where Jacob usurps or seizes Esau’s birthright as the first-born son. 

Origin: The name Jacob comes from the Hebrew name Ya’aqov, later translated into Latin as Iacobus. It is first introduced in the book of Genesis in the Old Testament.
Gender: Jacob is traditionally used as a boy name. Sometimes feminine suffixes, like -ina or -ine, are added to create Jacobina or Jacobine, though this is not common in the United States.

Name Variations 
There are many translations of the name Jacob in several other languages, including some stemming from its Hebrew origins.

Iacobus (Latin)
Jaco (Portuguese)
Jacoby
Jacopo (Italian)
Jago (Spanish/Cornish)
Jakob
Jakub (Polish)
Kubo (Japanese)
Yaakov (Hebrew)

A E
A E
2 months ago
Reply to  A E

From wiki: The name comes either from the Hebrew root עקב ʿqb meaning “to follow, to be behind” but also “to supplant, circumvent, assail, overreach”, or from the word for “heel”, עֲקֵב ʿaqeb. It can also be taken to mean “may God protect.”[1][2]

Wiki gives an impressively comprehensive list of language variants, some of which are very telling in modern usages, especially for entertainment/educative characters/personas/programs: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_(name)

A E
A E
2 months ago
Reply to  A E

hebraicthought dot org ties to the Achilles myth:

“If the most famous Hellenic heel is that of Achilles, then perhaps the most famous Hebraic heel association is that of Jacob. Jacob, the wily supplanter who is born grasping at his brother’s heel, seems at first a more likely comparison for the crafty Odysseus. But the stories of Achilles and Jacob also share important similarities: both deal with the issues of human weakness, of struggling with fate (or providence), and of the often mysterious will of the divine. Yet while Achilles’ heel is a mortal weakness bound up with fate and the aloof and mysterious divine, Jacob’s heel-grabbing is a moral weakness that is confronted by a gracious God who operates on the basis of not flesh but promise.

“Achilles himself suggests he can avoid the fate of an early death not through prayers or through living more piously but rather through manipulating circumstances.

“The Hellenic gods operate on a system of merit, a system where they love the mortals that please them—those who are beautiful, wise, pious, or spawned (adulterously) from their loins. Zeus credits his love for Hector to the fact that “his offerings never failed me,”10 while Achilles’ elder tells him that the gods can be appeased (perhaps even manipulated?) by prayer and sacrifice.11 Thus, the gods care more about piety—the proper fulfillment of propitiatory rituals—than about anything like the Hebraic concept of righteousness. They generally seem interested in their own good, not that of “miserable mortals.”12 Ultimately, mortals are subject to the arbitrary will of the gods and the fates, to which even the gods themselves are subject.13 Thus, Achilles’ heel points to his weakness—a weakness not moral but mortal, that of a human who wrestles with and is ultimately crushed under the weight of aloof and arbitrary gods and heartless fate.

“Like Achilles, the biblical patriarch Jacob also wrestles with weakness, fate, and the mysterious will of the divine.14 But Jacob’s story is very different. Smooth-skinned and a bit of a mama’s boy, Jacob does not strike us immediately as a comparison to Achilles, though as the biblical narrative unfolds, he performs more than one “‘Homeric’ feat of strength.”15 Moreover, Jacob does not enter the world fighting fair in face-to-face combat.16 Rather, the Biblical narrative records the birth of Jacob and his twin brother Esau in this way: Jacob, born second, “came out with his hand holding Esau’s heel, so his name was called Jacob.”17 The name “Jacob” itself means “heel” or “supplanter.” Notably, up to this point, only one other figure in Genesis has been associated with attacking the heel: the “cunning”18 serpent, whose deception of Eve led to the Fall and who is told by God, “[the woman’s offspring] shall bruise your head, / and you shall bruise his heel.”19 The cunning, heel-grabbing Jacob grows into a man who continues to try to make his own way in the world “underhandedly.”20

The entire article is telling, find it here if you wish: hebraicthought.org/achilles-heel-jacob-saved-by-weakness/

“Jacob bribes his brother Esau to sell him his birthright, and later he deceives his father, Isaac, to steal Esau’s blessing. Exploiting Isaac’s blindness and Esau’s absence while hunting, Jacob brings meat to his father, claiming, “I am Esau your firstborn.” When Isaac asks him, “How is it that you have found [the game] so quickly, my son?”, Jacob replies, “Because the Lord your God granted me success.”21 Leon Kass renders this, “God has sent me good speed.”22 Like Achilles, Jacob relies upon swiftness of feet and of words23 (that is, for Jacob, lies) to accomplish his ends. Esau responds to the news of the stolen blessing with the outburst: “Is he not rightly named Jacob? For he has supplanted me these two times.”24 Faced with Esau’s murderous anger, Jacob must swiftly foot to a distant land where he continues to grapple cunningly, struggling against his deceptive uncle Laban in the matters of marriage and business. 

“But Jacob does not only seek to manipulate other humans. When Jacob is fleeing from Esau, God meets him at Bethel and gives him an unconditional promise:

The land on which you lie I will give to you and to your offspring. Your offspring shall be like the dust of the earth . . . and in you and your offspring shall all the families of the earth be blessed. Behold, I am with you and will keep you wherever you go, and will bring you back to this land. For I will not leave you until I have done what I have promised you.25
Rather than simply receive the promise and yield himself to God, Jacob sets up conditions, “bargaining with God”26: “If God will be with me and will keep me . . . then the Lord shall be my God.”27 Jacob tries to manipulate God Himself.28 Even more, Jacob does not seem to trust God’s promise and would rather wrestle his fate into submission by his own power. Jacob the “Heel-Grabber” remains “the man who seizes his fate, tackles his adversaries, with his own two hands.”

A E
A E
2 months ago
Reply to  444Gem

What is God’s name in the Septuagint?

from wiktionary:

Κύριος

From Aramaic יהו‎ (“YHW”), related to Biblical Hebrew יהוה‎ (YHWH). In written use by Hellenistic Jews in the Septuagint before the Christian era, when it became standard to substitute Κύριος (Kúrios, “Lord”).

From obohu.cz:

From various preserved parts of Septuagint, which are dated till the 1st century b.c., till roughly to the 2nd century b.c.e., we can see, that the God’s name is being used in them. This is the commonly known tetragrammaton JHWH. There are fragments preserved, where is God’s name JHWH, written in the greek text by either fenic (fanax?) (or actually aramaic letters), protohebrew or by a classic hebrew quadratic letters. It is obvious, that during Jesus’s times, God’s name was known and used, and it was only since some second half of the 2nd century b.c.e. and later, started to be replaced by the expression “THEOS” – θεὸς – (God) or “KYRIOS” (Kurious?) – κύριος – (Lord).

A E
A E
2 months ago
Reply to  A E

Wikipedia:
“Kyrios or kurios (Ancient Greek: κύριος, romanized: kū́rios) is a Greek word which is usually translated as “lord” or “master”.[1] It is used in the Septuagint translation of the Hebrew scriptures about 7000 times,[2] in particular translating the name God YHWH (the Tetragrammaton),[3] and it appears in the Koine Greek New Testament about 740 times, usually referring to Jesus.

“In Classical Athens, the word kyrios referred to the head of the household,[8] who was responsible for his wife, children, and any unmarried female relatives. It was the responsibility of the kyrios to arrange the marriages of his female relatives,[9] provide their dowries, represent them in court, if necessary,[10] and deal with any economic transactions they were involved in worth more than a medimnos of barley.[11] When an Athenian woman married, her husband became her new kyrios.[12] The existence of the system of kurioi elsewhere in ancient Greece is debated, and the evidence is not clear-cut, but Cartledge has argued that in Sparta kurioi existed, although in Gortyn they do not appear to have done.[13]

The term “κύριος” is still in use in the Modern Greek language and is the equivalent to the English terms “mister” (title conferred on an adult male), “master” (someone who has control over something or someone), and “sir” (an address to any male). For example, the English term “Mr. Smith” is translated to “κύριος Σμίθ” (kyrios Smith) in Greek.

A E
A E
2 months ago
Reply to  A E

From glanierwordpress:
“As most Christians are aware, the Old Testament was originally written primarily in Hebrew with a few parts (a few chapters of Daniel and Ezra) in Aramaic. While the LORD ascribes numerous names to himself, his “covenant” name was YHWH (יהוה, also known as the “tetragrammaton”), which is usually written in English as Yahweh, though some folks (namely, Jehovah’s Witnesses) write it Jehovah, using different vowels with the consonants.

According to Jewish tradition as later codified in the Mishnah (specifically the Halakha), when the Hebrew Bible was read in the synagogue by Jews – and possibly even earlier in the first temple period, though that is debated – the covenant name of God was usually not pronounced (according to some Jewish writings, YHWH could be spoken, or, rather, sung, in some circumstances, such as priestly prayer or when reciting the Numbers 6 benediction). Rather, they substituted “Adonai” any time YHWH appeared in the text, and if they needed to refer to YHWH as the written name, they usually called it “HaShem” (The Name). Honoring this tradition, the Masoretes inserted the vowels for “Adonai” everywhere YHWH appeared, functioning as a sort of global “replace-all” to indicate what should be read aloud (qere) from the written text (kethiv).

” a more clear rendering of YHWH in Hebrew is י ה ו ה, which is read right-to-left.

Let’s say you were a young Jewish man ascribing to be a priest, and it was your turn to read from the sacred scriptures. Your synagogue used the Greek translation for the readings. You are going along, reading left-to-right, and you reach this somewhat strange set of four characters. Undaunted, and hoping to impress your supervising priests, you press on reading left-to-right, assuming that this strange word is actually Π Ι Π Ι, written in Greek capitals. Sadly, you just said that the holy, unpronounceable name of the transcendent God of the Universe is … “Pipi (Papa/Pope).” While the similarities aren’t clear in modern computer fonts, in handwritten upper-case Greek they would have been hard to distinguish for the untrained eye: י ה ו ה … Π Ι Π Ι.

“Jerome, the great translator of the Vulgate, commented in a letter in 384 AD that “certain ignorant ones, because of the similarity of the characters, when they would find it in Greek books, were accustomed to read PIPI”

444Gem
444Gem
2 months ago
Reply to  A E

I just submitted chapter X.

Yakov the usurper makes an appearance.

A E
A E
2 months ago
Reply to  444Gem

Oh YAY!! (About time! JK, jk, lol)
Thank you!!

444Gem
444Gem
2 months ago
Reply to  A E

In this chapter in the Hebrew version It says Yakov as struggled with “God and with Men.”

Yet the words use for God is אֱלֹהִ֛ים Alohim not YHWH and for “men,” it is not Adam but rather אֲנָשִׁ֖ים “Anas-im,” as in Hanas. In the Sabrina texts it is written אנס Hanas directly. It says he shall be called Isis Ra El because he has struggled with the shining ones and Serpents.

The world translated as “struggle,” is שָׂרִ֧יתָ Shar-it, but as a conjugation, and it means “Sar,” as in Usarus. The powerful reborn solar man. And the word for “Prevail,” is וַתּוּכָֽל׃ Wetukal. The only placs that word appears in the Old Testament is in 1 Kings 10 when it says that Hiram Abiff the mason brought Wetukki to Soli man the sun king. We Tukki are Solar peacocks whose radiant feathers are as the Phoenix and with a million eyes, like Ra.

The phrase of Genesis 32:28 quite literally tells the story that Lucifer tells Yakov, while masquerading as YHWH “You won’t be called Usurper, the who bites the heel, you shall be called Isis-Ra-EL, for you have become Osiris and persisted with the shining one and the Serpents, and you have prevailed as the great solar bird, the Phoenix.

A E
A E
2 months ago
Reply to  444Gem

Isn’t Hiram Abiff one of the first initiation mysteries of the Masons?

So Yakov fell to the last temptation, to “bow down and worship me and you shall be as god(s) in the earth”.

A E
A E
2 months ago
Reply to  A E

And he fell because of the spirit of Belial – he felt an inherent worthlessness – he’d always believed, since the womb, that he had to make his own way – he’d been formed to follow yet wanted to head – that fear of lack and insufficiency and his inability to trust YHWH to see to his person and needs caused him to fall for a “more tangible evidence” to his mind.
This need for the sign of the fleece – the more tangible evidence – is one of the reasons the Catholic Church has remained so strong – their usurpation of Yeshua’s role of High Priest in confession rites, alone, offers those men susceptible to this that “voice from heaven” that allays them for a time, but never truly cleanses.
I completely get them – I needed those signs for so long, too.

A E
A E
2 months ago
Reply to  A E

But that means that they are literally going to God’s and man’s mortal and immortal enemy for the evidences and approbations they desire from God. Trusting the seen (created – self – Lucifer) over the unseen (Creator – Spirit – God).

A E
A E
2 months ago
Reply to  444Gem

A million points of light….

SoAnnoyed
SoAnnoyed
2 months ago
Reply to  444Gem

Jacob: he who follows, pull by the heel. In latin, he who supplants which isnt negative if understood as “he who replaces”.

Genesis 25:23 foretold the “older shall serve the younger“: when the parents saw Jacob holding on to Esau’s heel, they simply named him according to the prophecy which they were aware of.

It must be reminded that, as Jacob “supplanted” his brother’s right, his life was imprinted by a sense of replacement: he was tricked by Lavan (who replaced one daughter by the other) and then by his own sons (Joseph).

I hear your theory based on the etymology of his name and on some verses.

Yet, since you know I do not take such verses as primary sources of truth; I’d rather apply a critical approach on what could fit/wouldnt fit a Being like G-d.

Of course, such approach cannot be verified, it’s just a theory among others:
G-d made a covenant with Jacob. I suppose, G-d knowing the unknown, He wouldnt make a deal with a deceiver; even if Jacob may seem so, a priori.

What is your opinion on G-d choosing Jacob to be part of his covenant?

kittyvac
kittyvac
2 months ago
Reply to  444Gem

Thank you 🙂

SoAnnoyed
SoAnnoyed
2 months ago
Reply to  444Gem

If you write :

“They are Phar I See, Fire I Sees, Luciferians that worship light. They are imposters”

Then do you confirm that St Paul/Saul, who was a Pharisee, is also an imposter and as such, that the Scriptures have been tampered with (at least by his teachings)?

444Gem
444Gem
2 months ago
Reply to  SoAnnoyed

I have written at length regarding the writings of Saul of Tarshish, the “solar seeker of the six.” I have also written at length regarding the evident tampering by the usurpers of scriptures.

There is a tremendous misunderstanding of the nature of scriptures in a modern materialist perception, supposedly unchanging, either A or B, to be understood as “past writings.” No, instead the scriptures exist, given by YHWH in his infinite wisdom, as four dimensional fractals, that reveal The Truth for those that ask with Truth in heart, but which remain sealed to all those that do not know Yeshua Truly. These are the seals of the scroll in revelations only the little lamb, the Aryeh Yehudah, written “Arnion,” is worthy to unseal.

Would the scriptures be given breathed by YHWH, and he be ignorant that many would taint them as time progressed? How could we do vastly underestimate the one who spoke all into existence? He gave them as the keys, living and breathing documents that grow like trees in the four dimensional fractals of our universe. As we can study the rings of trees to know climatological conditions of the past where the Tree has grown, we must study the scriptures to know the conditions in which they are received at this moment.

The twisting of scriptures reveals much more of The Truth of the history of humanity and the activities of the enemies of YHWH than can be imagined. And for those with eyes to see and Yeshua Kavannah, The Truth of YHWH in the heart, they reveal The Truth of YHWH.

SoAnnoyed
SoAnnoyed
2 months ago
Reply to  444Gem

Thank you for your answer, i appreciate you took the time to answer my questions.

You say:
“Would the scriptures be given breathed by YHWH, and he be ignorant that many would taint them as time progressed”
Doesnt He have the power to send a book that could remained untouched? I believe he can.

“These are the seals of the scroll in revelations only the little lamb, the Aryeh Yehudah, written “Arnion,” is worthy to unseal”:
Such theory would go against the fundamentals of G-d and religion (= a revelation from G-d to mankind).

Indeed, if He intends to inform His creatures of their purpose here and what He expects from us, He needs to send prophets and scriptures containing a clear message. We both agree He did.
Yes, some scriptures were more tampered with (by all the ones you mentionned).
But iys easy to see the logical continuity in all His messages. Even in Hinduism, Zoroastrism, Buddhism etc you will find the one unique G-d. Ask the scholars of those faiths.
So isnt the Message already clear enough?

Also, i believe G-d is just and fair. Yet He cannot be so if one follows your theory.
Why? Because we wouldnt be able to be held accountable if the message was hidden or, as you believe, only meant to some : Cant blame one if he doesnt know/understand the message.

Plus, why was the message very clear and constant before?

To me, whatever is hidden, secret or “needs unlocking/initiation” can only be the work of the obscure… look at what the elite and the powerful are doing right now around the world. It’s always in secrecy.
Light cannot shine behind closed doors unless it comes from someone else.

A E
A E
2 months ago
Reply to  SoAnnoyed

What Gem has been saying over and again is that the knowledge that YHWH offers is free to all who Knock (go to the appropriate source, which is the Creator). Ask (Why?). Seek (search via due diligence and you *shall find). Then ALL DOORS may be opened unto you.
That is not gnosis – that is knowledge intended for the children being guarded against the wolves, foxes, hawks and other predators who desire it for their own purposes.

A E
A E
2 months ago
Reply to  A E

How do you know if you are one of His children? (God’s/Creator’s).
Is your heart inclined towards Him? Do you ask Him for guidance in all things, then listen to what He tells you and do it?
Why do you seek what He has to share? How will you use said knowledge, understanding and wisdom?
That is how you know.
No Gno necessary. No initiation, no hazing (not from God – that is the work of other entities trying to keep you from the truth).

SoAnnoyed
SoAnnoyed
2 months ago
Reply to  A E

As @Hollow Logs said above, “this is a rare forum from which one can extract great meaning & knowledge..(..) we are all striving to know more.. every day adding to the compendium”.

This is precisely the reason why I asked the questions to Gem. We can all benefit from each other’s knowledge but for that to happen, there need to be exchanges, and most of the time, with the ones we dont agree with.

@AE thank you for your input. Yet, my questions remained unanswered.
I do not know what Gem “has been saying over and again”, I simply react to the messages I read in this page.

You say in your message below :

-“How do you know if you are one of His children? (….) That is how you know?”

First, we all are His creatures/children.

As He said and repeated, the only ones worthy to His eyes are the ones who follow the Laws and submit to Him. So yes, my only desire is to be one of the submitted children of His.

To be so, He has given us, like I said earlier, countless proofs. We just need to open our eyes, or our window: the analysis of an ant, the clouds, the winds, the trees or of the hand that opens the window or of the eyes that contemplate His Creation: there are enough signs if we use our reason (meaning science).

We dont need more to know He exists, that He is above all and everyone, and as such, cant have begotten sons, just creatures He designed for a purpose; and a Creation to provide for his human creation so the latter can focus on the purpose of this present life.

He wants us the easy way. An easy way that requires discipline, for our own good.
Whether one believes or not doesnt make any difference to Him. He isnt going to be deprived by us. We dont give Him anything that He could need to sustain Himself.
However, He does to us and provide us with all this creation to breathe, eat, drink, cure…

so first, that is my definition of the Creator so we may be on common terms.

SoAnnoyed
SoAnnoyed
2 months ago
Reply to  SoAnnoyed

Then, you say :
“No Gno necessary. No initiation, no hazing (not from God – that is the work of other entities trying to keep you from the truth).”

Yet just above, you wrote:

“knowledge that YHWH offers is free to all who Knock”.

This is confusing to me: it’s available IF one knocks? If one knocks, it means one requests something. Here, it means one needs to request a “knowledge”.

This is precisely why I asked my questions, which are still unanswered:

  • why would G-d expect us to REQUEST another knowledge when He has already GIVING it to us in a clear manner with clear texts, so there is no doubt about his Message?
  • What is this knowledge adding to the Laws and clear Messages He has already given to mankind?
  • isnt believing that there is another “knowledge-to-be-deserved” like ignoring His bounty when He sent us Scriptures to strip us away from our barbaric ways?
  • Isnt requesting a further knowledge like complaining on the clarity of G-d’s message contained in the Scriptures?
  • If there is another knowledge-to-be-deserved that is only available to a few/those who knock; then on what basis will G-d judge His servants: Will He favor the ones who knocked or those who followed his clear unchanged commandments found in his different Scriptures?

See, G-d is Fair, Just and Wise. As such, He is straightforward, no playing with words or else.

Also, in reaction to Gem confirming the tampering of some of G-d’s Scriptures, how can one assert that this “knowledge-to-be-deserved” can still hold the test of verification and truth, if it is based on those corrupted books?

I want to understand and I think this is the place for it. So, these are honest questions I ask myself and you.

444Gem
444Gem
2 months ago
Reply to  SoAnnoyed

The question “doesn’t he have the power to send a book that could remain untouched,” stems from a logical fallacy; YHWH knows everything that has is or ever will be. The scriptures were sent for the purpose of being the keys to The Truth for all, not to be monolithic purity frozen in time. That is the territory of the statues of the Men of Renown, the Osirians. See Berashid for the phrase “Men of Renown.”

The essence of free will, a gift we are so generously given, ensures that the wicked shall distort his message however possible. Surely YHWH could make a tree that appears fully formed, never grows, never changes with the seasons, nor dies, but then it would not be alive. It would cease to have what Yeshua called πνεύμα The Breath. YHWH could make a human as this too, and then it would also be a statue… The first Scriptures of the Bible are called the Torah, in which is contained the word רוח Ruahk, which means The Breath. They are living, not statues.

444Gem
444Gem
2 months ago
Reply to  444Gem

Continuing on:

You claim that God’s righteousness means that everything within scripture must be easily seen by all. It is available, but like anything we don’t set our hearts to understand, it will not be understood.

Ehen speaking to his disciples after speaking to many and telling them the parable of the sower of seeds, Yeshua said:

“But blessed are your eyes because they see, and your ears because they hear. For truly I tell you, many prophets and righteous people longed to see what you see but did not see it, and to hear what you hear but did not hear it.

Listen then to what the parable of the sower means: When anyone hears the message about the kingdom and does not understand it, the evil one comes and snatches away what was sown in their heart. This is the seed sown along the path. The seed falling on rocky ground refers to someone who hears the word and at once receives it with joy. But since they have no root, they last only a short time. When trouble or persecution comes because of the word, they quickly fall away. The seed falling among the thorns refers to someone who hears the word, but the worries of this life and the deceitfulness of wealth choke the word, making it unfruitful. But the seed falling on good soil refers to someone who hears the word and understands it. This is the one who produces a crop, yielding a hundred, sixty or thirty times what was sown.”

Certainly you can see that Yeshua understood many do not have eyes to see nor ears to hear. They are told, and hear whatever is convenient for them; the people have always preferred Ba-Ra-Abban (the Lord of Light) and his lies and murder m, to Yeshua, God’s Truth.

You claim I come from a Luciferian methodology of secrets and societies, but yet, I give freely of what I have seen and ask nothing in return. I do not use “secret sources” to unveil it; I use publicly available scripture and information freely available to all, and I do not filter who may read the material, or ask for any oath (which is forbeid by scripture.) I do not encourage obedience or blind faith, but encourage those to use their own minds and hearts while asking The Father. This is The Way.

Indeed, many have set about mistranslating and creating false interpretation to deceive the many, and Yeshua was clear about this too:

“Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves.”

The Wisdom of YHWH is like a gate to the city where one must only knock and ask for entrance with Truth in their heart. For all that do, it is free to pass inside.

Yeshua said:

“Knock (and keep knocking) and the door will be opened for you. For everyone who asks (and keeps on asking) receives. He who seeks (and keeps on seeking) finds. To him who knocks (and keeps on knocking) the door will be opened”

Nobody
Nobody
2 months ago
Reply to  444Gem

Thank you for your answers, I still have questions, sorry. I cant understand some of your theories:

The question “doesn’t he have the power to send a book that could remain untouched,” stems from a logical fallacy” : Can you prove me how it is a logical fallacy, meaning, an error in the “what” or the “how” of my argument?
It is not, because there are many Scriptures pretending to be from G-d. Have you read them ALL? I expect to read a “yes”. If not, you cannot pretend it is a fallacy until you have read them ALL.
Once you have, or maybe you did, I would expect you explain why none of them are untouched. Then, and only then, you can go on with your theory of the breath/word. Yet, you skip that part and go on when this first step was the question.

“(…) They are living, not statues”: are you making a parallel between humans and scriptures, that as we breathe, so must the message?..How did you validate that theory?

“You claim that God’s righteousness means that everything within scripture must be easily seen by all. It is available, but like anything we don’t set our hearts to understand, it will not be understood.”: No, please read me again. I have used enough adjectives to depict the greatness of G-d to make you understand it doesnt befit Him to play with words or guesses. His whole creation is straight to the point. His Messages, His words are also part of the Creation. So straight are/must be his Messages. Why do you only focus on the texts that have been the most tampered with and for which there is NOT ONE ORIGINAL VERSION to back those claims?

“You claim I come from a Luciferian methodology of secrets and societies (…) I do not use “secret sources” to unveil it”: Gem, I hope you will be honest enough to acknowledge that such claims are only yours.

“”encourage those to use their own minds and hearts while asking The Father. This is The Way.”: Have you envisionned that maybe, I say maybe, you could be wrong in your theory? That maybe there is no knocking on a door to get a knowlege-to-be-deserved?

SoAnnoyed
SoAnnoyed
2 months ago
Reply to  Nobody

(sorry, this is SoAnnoyed, not my computer and its writing another pseudo)

444Gem
444Gem
2 months ago
Reply to  Nobody

I have explained how the belief that scriptures should be like statues is fallacy in my previous comment from many angles, but you have not considered them. The name of the Torah means “Living Breath of YHWH.” How then should I not consider the scripture to be living and breathing?

I showed you where Yeshua himself makes it clear that even prophets spent their lives not seeing nor hearing what his disciples had in a few short years. They were not worthy. He also explains the parable of the sower, and why these seeds of Truth will most often not grow into fruitful crops, for many have hearts that are like rocks and thistes. In Proverbs 27 it states:

“No matter what you do to help a fool, he will stay a fool, for he has no heart for wisdom.”

You are correct that YHWH does not play with “words or guesses.” Yet how many claim to understand these scriptures and have not read one word in Hebrew or Greek? Instead, the vast majority rely upon poor translations that have been far more twisted than any of the original texts. And then, the majority of those that have sat with the original texts learned to do so in ecclesiastical schools, where their intellects were trained by the ravenous wolves to deceive them.

Yeshua himself claimed that we must knock at the door to receive the wisdom of YHWH. Should I disbelieve in such a simple statement? These are not “my theories,” but the words of Yeshua.

You claim I must read ALL “scriptures” to understand anything, is this not a fallacy of quantity over quality? I have read many thousands of scriptures, ancient texts, translated ancient tablets, and visited and studied innumerable ancient sights, but certainly not all; your claim that you expected I would say Yes, I’ve read them ALL, is a tactic of rhetoric (providing the desired response before it is given) and a projection into how you perceive me based upon the emotions evoked from past experiences unrelated to me. If one cannot understand even the nail on the finger of God, how may one possibly read ALL of the scriptures?

Truly I tell you, that if you can understand one word from scripture, that the word grows like a living Tree in your heart, you will have seen more Truth that the prophets that spent lives reading without eyes to see.

(Mathew 13) Yeshua Said:

“The kingdom of heaven is like a mustard seed, which a man took and planted in his field. Though it is the smallest of all seeds, yet when it grows, it is the largest of garden plants and becomes a tree, so that the birds come and perch in its branches…

The kingdom of heaven is like yeast that a woman took and mixed into about sixty pounds of flour until it worked all through the dough.”

According to Yeshua, the Son of Man, we must use the parable of a Mustard Seed that Grows into a tree and yeast which consumes flour for the Kingdom of YHWH; are his scriptures not his domain? Are Trees and Yeast not Living?

Revelations 5:

“Then I saw in the right hand of him who sat on the throne a scroll with writing on both sides and sealed with seven seals. And I saw a mighty angel proclaiming in a loud voice, “Who is worthy to break the seals and open the scroll?” But no one in heaven or on earth or under the earth could open the scroll or even look inside it. I wept and wept because no one was found who was worthy to open the scroll or look inside. Then one of the elders said to me, “Do not weep! See, the Lion of the tribe of Judah, the Root of David, has triumphed. He is able to open the scroll and its seven seals.”

The scroll is not hidden, but according to the living word of YHWH, there were none worthy to unseal it until the Lion of the Tribe of Judah. These are not my words, but those of Yeshua.

SoAnnoyed
SoAnnoyed
2 months ago
Reply to  444Gem

Gem, repeating that my assertions are fallacies without bothering to offer proper objective proofs arent enough to give strength to your claims.

I will nonetheless answer to these:

  • I have explained how the belief that scriptures should be like statues is fallacy“: No, you have not demonstrated it, you repeated the assertion which is that a scripture should not be unchanging. This is just an undemonstrated conjecture of yours
  • The name of the Torah means “Living Breath of YHWH. How then should I not consider the scripture to be living and breathing?“: your understanding is based on the litteral meaning, which could also be understood as “the eternal/undying word of God”?

Or should we then give a litteral meaning to this as well: “You shall eat it as a barley cake, having baked it in their sight over human dung. See, I will give you cow’s dung in place of human dung over which you will prepare your bread.”? Ezekiel 4:12/15

  • “I showed you where Yeshua himself makes it clear that even prophets spent their lives not seeing nor hearing what his disciples had in a few short years(…)“: a few words out of thousands from a Scripture that is not an original version doesnt clear anything.
  • how many claim to understand these scriptures and have not read one word in Hebrew or Greek?“: what is the need to understand Greek or Hebrew since these were not the languages spoken by Jesus? As you know, there was no writings of his parables or teachings at the time of his life. As you know, the oldest versions of the OT and NT are in old greek and dates back to centuries after his death. Thus, the oldest greek version is itself a translation of a translated text written several centuries after the life of Jesus.

Do you think a judge would accept from your heirs a translation of a translated version of your testament which was not written by you during your own life? I doubt so.

  • Yeshua himself claimed that we must knock at the door to receive the wisdom of YHWH. Should I disbelieve in such a simple statement? These are not “my theories,” but the words of Yeshua.“: No, you cannot prove these are exactly the words of Jeshua. These are the words that an unknown number of scribes and translators have said come from Jeshua. You cannot say otherwise; hence, that this isnt your theory but the words of Jesus.
  • “You claim I must read ALL “scriptures” to understand anything, is this not a fallacy of quantity over quality?“: you keep seeing fallacies everywhere while you ignore yours.

How can you assert that such scriptures are not of quality if you havent read them?
How can you imply that your sources are of a “better quality” when you have no original versions of those scriptures while you have original versions of other scriptures which postulate to come from G-d himself?
Wouldnt it worth it to add them to your research for the sake of critical mind since you said it is necessary to have one?
What a few books would be in comparison of the thousands you have read for the sake of your theory; especially if they could maybe add insight to it?

  • your claim that you expected I would say Yes, I’ve read them ALL, is a tactic of rhetoric“: I dont need tactics, far from me. I sincerely believed you did read them, especially for someone who has read, as you wrote, thousands of texts.
  • If one cannot understand even the nail on the finger of God, how may one possibly read ALL of the scriptures?“: Yet this hasnt prevented you from reading thousands of ancient manuscripts?

You may be right on the fact that, if I have projected something on you, it may be that I thought we had used the same methodology. If I wonder about G-d, then logically, I have to understand the concept of G-d and everything in between. Where was I to find this information? First, by reading all the Books which pretended to come from G-d. Then the books criticizing those same Scriptures.
Otherwise, how can we pretend to know someone/something if we dont study the texts that speak of it?
Would we accept that a Doctor become so by studying plumbery? Of course not.
I suppose yourself had to discriminate which ancient manuscripts to read to only keep those dealing with the subject at hand?

  • “No matter what you do to help a fool, he will stay a fool, for he has no heart for wisdom.”: you’ve used it many times, and in bold…This is well said by Jesus, the wise: “wisdom” means sound and unbiased judgement, common sense.

As I believe strongly, Truth never fails to stand the test of common sense and unbiased judgement.

A E
A E
2 months ago
Reply to  444Gem

Applying American slang it also seems he is giving a nod to his own sadistic pedophilia as well as cruel domination over lesser adults, “suffer” “the little children” (“to come” unto – Biblical allusion to entering into a bedchamber for the purposes of sexual ‘knowing’).

Vievie
Vievie
2 months ago

Interesting, too, that he’s chosen as his Twitter profile photo one of the pics from Halloween in his Lord of the Underworld costume. I wish our culture didn’t reward sociopaths.

Marcos
Marcos
2 months ago

He uses the picture of his Baphomet costume on his profile pic.
He says he wants to go to hell. He marries a satanist.
Is it so hard to see?

Rosey
Rosey
2 months ago

I don’t like the mockery in it as if he is special.

Roadside Prophet
Roadside Prophet
2 months ago

Alex while not in studio today, exposed Musk and his PR firms to open his show today while on vacation. The roughly 10 minutes he spent discussing this is worth listening to for perspective.

What I’ve been interested in here is what the … is Sam Harris doing involving himself in this? Harris a frequent writer for the NY Times, The Atlantic, TED talks etc. As well as being a promoter of Yuval Noah Harari and supporting Hilliary Clinton’s Presidential run. Harris, being on the opposite end of virtually everything a Christian Warrior such as Alex represents. Is calling for an Alex return to twitter? Interesting, very…

Roadside Prophet
Roadside Prophet
2 months ago

Harris deleted his twitter account earlier today.

john
john
2 months ago

Elon implies He is the one speaking

SoAnnoyed
SoAnnoyed
2 months ago

Vegetables, fruits and plants also are “live organisms”.

But like it has been said by some and because everything in this creation has been made for the sole purpose of mankind, eat from it all.

No living organism is unbeneficial to humans, one way or the other. Even venom is, as it it is used in some medecines (and botox lol).

Not eating from all of this brings unbalance no matter what vegan will tell u. Nothing can make up for the type of proteins contained in meat.

The only think we shouldnt eat is actually what is not from that creation: processed food and the naturally repulsing things such as rats or insects (Studies show that >80% of them contain harmful bacterias which can lead to death).

You will find nothing beneficial in processed food. Just disease and death.

So eat reasonably from everything and forget about the vegan/insects diet trends.

NotAnnoyed
NotAnnoyed
2 months ago
Reply to  SoAnnoyed

nothing can make up for meat protein but not eating them isn’t lethal either – most diets that exclude them = longer life

SoAnnoyed
SoAnnoyed
2 months ago
Reply to  NotAnnoyed

You downvoted me because what i said is proven?
I havent said its lethal. I said it brings unbalance that most of vegan need to supplement.

As your last assertion “most diets that exclude meat= longer life”: please post your sources..

A E
A E
2 months ago
Reply to  SoAnnoyed

I agree with this, SoAnn (not NoAnn).
There are ways to process insects not already approved by God and even to process nasty animals you wouldn’t eat unless you had no other options, but those take study, understanding and patience to learn. Not the ideal foods unless you are starving and that is all you have.

Luis Meriño Vásquez
Luis Meriño Vásquez
2 months ago

Wtf

Rick
Rick
2 months ago

Maybe touting or mocking that he is Christ. To have Alex Jones go to him for “salvation”.

Definitely going to see the insanity bleed out of this man’s head in the future. His madness is showing.

Rick
Rick
2 months ago
Reply to  Rick

Twitter is heaven in his quote?