in

Remember to mention WTC-7 Today

What do you think?

52 Points
Upvote Downvote
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

6 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jakub
Jakub
18 days ago

For many years I was willing to accept the official story according to which it was “simply” a terrorist attack, even if committed by a group that had initially been funded by the CIA. Today, however, I am convinced that it was a satanic megaritual executed by MKUltra patsies ultimately answerable to luciferian secret societies behind the CIA and other Deep State structures. They have to routinely execute these kinds of feats in order to increase satan’s dominion over this fallen world. Notice how things have almost immediately taken a turn for the worse following this event – in every field, not just politics. The same goes for the Pachamama debacle that inaugurated the Chinese flu circus – or, for that matter, for the Vatican II debacle that inaugurated the “sexual revolution”. As we approach the public revelation of the Antichrist, these kinds of events have to be increasingly blatant and global in scope if mankind is to fall almost completely under the spell of the Great Deception – and so far this is precisely what has been happening. Let us remain steadfastly in the final Remnant that is fully aware of the nature of such machinations and impervious to the smoke and stench of unreality spread by the ultimate loser and his minions. Christ be with you. 

Lee
Lee
18 days ago
Reply to  Jakub

Amen.

philonous
philonous
6 days ago
Reply to  Jakub

You seem to me to be laboring under two rather unfortunate delusions. First, you’re attributing absurdly simple and restricted causes (e.g. Vatican II) to these events (e.g. the
sexual revolution), when in fact they were a result of a vast number of social, cultural, political, and historical factors combined together over a period of years—well, at least in the case of the “sexual revolution,” as you call it. Second, the mere fact that one event follows after another doesn’t do anything in the slightest to show that the first event caused the second. For, were that all that was needed in order to know that one event causes another, I’d then be able to say, for instance, that the death of David Pinsent was caused by the induction of Ludwig Wittgenstein into the Cambridge Apostles, simply because the former occurred a few years after the latter. Again, you’ve rather fallen short of offering anything anywhere near to probative evidence for you claims here.

simon
simon
18 days ago

With a special thanks to the BBC for accidentally going off script in their reporting to honour this part of ‘the attack’. Have the BBC ever publicly explained this?

Fleurdamour
Fleurdamour
18 days ago

I’ve actually been in that building. I worked for a company in lower Manhattan at the time and it had space in WTC7 that was all back office for storage of records. The floors they used were full of long rows of filing cabinets stuffed full of paper, and some office furniture. When I saw the collapse that’s the first thing I thought of. If the rest of that building was similar use, I am sure it was an inferno. And it was right across a very narrow street from the main WTC plaza so I can see how debris fell right on it and started a fire. I don’t claim to know what happened in general with 911, I just have some personal experience with going to WTC7 to retrieve records. Here is a video about what the investigators found: https://youtu.be/PK_iBYSqEsc

donpaul
donpaul
7 days ago

Jim’s wtc7.net was and is, I think, a great resource for investigating the crimes of 9/11/01.