The story opens with references to the family ‘rift’. https://www.the-sun.com/news/6192673/prince-harry-william-kate-windsor/
I’m just getting that all eyes are on Meghan here. She is in the vast majority of the photos and if you watch the video, she seems to be the one kept most within focal perspective. The still shot used for this story on Drudge shows all the other members looking in her direction (yes, I see she’s looking left, too, but the eye is still drawn to her). Click on the pictures slideshow and you’ll see her cooing over babies and children, while the few pics of Kate seem cold in contrast.
This, inexplicably (she actually looks starry-eyed to me, like she’s just come from her fairy godmother and is now the belle of the ball but is trying hard to project Properly Mournful):
Isn’t it a little weird they took this shot and pensively captioned it when Meghan is the least pertinent person in this story? She didn’t even go with her husband the day the Queen purportedly passed.
Look at Kate’s facial expression from the start:
Now look at Meghan’s:
Meg’s also the only one wearing visible jewelry beside wedding rings and watches on the men, which remain mostly covered. She has three gold bracelets on her left wrist seen very clearly in two of the photos. Does this mean a thing? I dunno, but perhaps someone does.
I think Meghan was the Queen’s chosen heir for the passing of her spiritual ‘gifts’.
Most stories I’ve been reading are really chatting up how the Royal Family must change, discussing Meghan’s successful podcast (which had Oprah’s early support to kick it off) – her ratings beat Joe Rogan’s. Several have mentioned longingly how much ‘good she could do’ by going into politics.
The idea of a family rift is a sham and her children are still titled, as they clearly are as well. They were sent to America to be heads here.
I read today that the Royal Family is called The Firm. These two are still firmly doing the Firm’s work.