BREAKING: New TikTok ban bill HR7521 gives the Executive Branch of government the power to define any platform/website as “foreign owned” even if domestic, giving them the ability to control/censor the content being published by the company. pic.twitter.com/asgStv4zXx
— Patrick Webb (@RealPatrickWebb) March 13, 2024
in Social Media
The bill banning TikTok is a trojan horse for internet censorhip
VC
36 Votes
Ironically enough the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, its Constitution and all its assets is 100% foreign-owned as it is all owned by the Bank of England and has been since 1871 when the united states of america was legally redefined as a corporation known as the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (legally that refers to D.C., which owns the rest of the, former, republic) with the Bank of England as its owners. This was signed into Constitutional law in 1871, after the Banksters had economically ruined the US through staging the Civil War, leaving the US with no other choice. The UNITED STATES is thus 100% foreign-owned and also 100% foreign-controlled through the Bank of England-owned and controlled Federal Reserve (corporation.)
This does mean that domestic internet services and web sites are, legally, foreign. Perhaps that’s what allows them to designate any service or website as foreign, even if it’s ostensibly domestic.
Could you please shoot me some book titles or links to websites with this info? I’ve been trying to do research regarding that and I need some good starting points.
Yes, here’s a video explaining it. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lVsMUpPgdT0&embeds_referring_euri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youhavetheright.com%2F&source_ve_path=Mjg2NjY&feature=emb_logo
In essence, the 41th Congress, facing the threat of economic ruin due to the (Banksters’) Civil War passed seemingly small but legally very significant changes to the US Constitution, or rather, made en entirely new constitution almost identical to the old one, the real one.
The act was ostensibly to establish a government for the District of Columbia but it also included very significant changes to the Constitution.
These changes were to change “Constitution for the united states of America” to CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
In legal terms “united states of America” is an entirely different entity than “UNITED STATES OF AMERICA” as when words are capitalized in legal documents that means that they refer to a non-extant entity, someone or something which only exist on paper but not in the real world. This could refer to either someone or something which has existed but no longer does (such as a dead person or a lost ship,) to something fictional or to a corporation. Changing the wording in “Constitution for…) to “CONSTITUTION OF…) legally alters the meaning to designate the constitution as property of the UNITED STATES rather than serving for it. As this all changes the Constitution to serve a completely different entity, it de facto made it into a new constitution. And since the Act it was a part of refer and pertain to not the united states of America but to the District of Columbia this became a new constitution for it and not the united states of America. It is thus a CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA but actually refer to and is limited to D.C., which is the seat of and property of THE UNITED STATES corporations.
The old Constitution and Republic thus remain but is sidelined by the new (D.C.-only) one. The rest of the former united states has subsequently been taken as property of the US corporation by turning it all into subsidiary corporations. I’m not sure exactly how this was achieved but it has for a fact as all US government agencies, states and cities are, in fact, registered as corporations. You can find DUNS lookup numbers for much of it on HenryMakow(dot)com in an article called “The Bank of England is a Criminal Conspiracy” or something similar to that.
Also of relevance is the similar British Act of 1666 (The Lost at Sea Act.) This was passed as “emergency measures” after the London City Fire (Talmudist-Masonic city arson) of that year. It designated all British citizens as “lost at sea, presumed dead” which means that, in legal terms, British citizens don’t exist which in turns mean that all their property is in the ward of the State, pending the “return” of owners or rightful inheritors.
This legal trickery has continued on since then. For instance, legal changes and established prescedents have altered the definition of bank deposits from funds deposited in bank, sovereignly owned by depositor to instead be defining deposits as investing money in the bank, which means that deposited money becomes property of the bank. Similar trickery has made stocks and bonds redefined into being “security entitlements” which the investor merely has a claim to but no sovereign right to.
I wrote a reply with info and a link but it’s “awaiting approval.” In the meantime you can use Brave Search to search for Act of 1871. You’ll have to scan through a lot of FUD, deception and misdirection from mainstream media, “fact checkers” and such but before long you’ll find some sites which show what it’s actually was about and its profound legal implications and ramifications.
Additionally, if you search for US Code Title 28 3002 (15) (A) (B) (C) you’ll find it is specified that “United States” legally refers to a “Federal corporation.”
I posted more links, seems they’re not yet approved.
https://henrymakow.com/2024/03/patrick-ocarroll—bank-of-eng.html
Yes, and the media will promote this as “a measure to protect children and adults from disinformation.” What utter BS.
And what is “a measure” in their terms but a RULER to be used as punishment.
These psychopathic tyrants want to do whatever they want in their inverted perverted dungeons, but police and punish anyone who calls their sickness for what it is and works to genuinely protect us!