lgageharleya
“Missouri v. Biden was filed on May 5, 2022. Since it was initially filed, it has taken quite a trip through the court system…”
“The most widespread and troubling discovery? CISA has designated YOUR THOUGHTS part of the government’s infrastructure. They call it “cognitive infrastructure.”
“They argue they can regulate what you think as they consider it under their purview.”
The hyperlink above expands further on this concept and how they euphemistically try to make it sound like they’re not doing exactly what they’re doing.
“…the pair writes about the “assault on trust in the digital age, indeed an assault on what’s arguably our most critical asset: our cognitive infrastructure.” They refer to this assault on trust as a “disease.” Referencing a column on Just Security by Jonathon Morgan and Renee DiResta—who is one of the top disinformation collaborators for EIP—Easterly and Geltzer write about America’s cognitive infrastructure and their quest to “shield it from assault” and to “protect the ‘human-operating system.’”
“America’s cognitive infrastructure, they say is “foundational to our country’s economic and political health.”
“Here they also advocate for partnerships between social media companies and independent fact-checkers like Snopes.com to avoid “viral falsehoods.” They conclude that “good national security policy” is only as good as “the set of facts” that define the issues we debate. “The human impulse,” they write, is to “regard seeing as believing.” I quote:
“It’s no secret that good national security policy rests on good decision-making. But good decision-making rests on good information and basic trust that, when we debate tough issues, there’s at least a set of facts in the world defining those issues. Before we can improve America’s national security decision-making, we need to improve a piece of our critical infrastructure long taken for granted: our cognitive infrastructure.”
“Top-down control of “the facts” seems to be a guiding principle for Easterly. She and her team define who the “trusted experts” are.”
This is just another way of stating that they lament and wish to return to the days when America’s news was so tightly controlled (without appearing to be) that it was unquestionable. When everyone respected and trusted the big anchormen and the opinions were better cloaked, or when obvious, were unchallenged.
@Igageharleya
The entire legal argument reads like a rip off and reformulation of 1984’s Newsspeak and Crimethink…
That cognitive infrastructure needs to be protected to ensure it is properly training IA for the mining of the brain and body activity (patent W0-2020-060606)
It’s almost exclusively attorneys in politics anymore. Attorneys are specifically trained in using euphemized language, fine technicalities and tortuous arguments to win debates and thereby social arguments which seem apparent to the majority, but must be pressed through on thin technicalities. In other words, they are master purveyors of b.s. At least, in the wild, b.s. has longterm value…
One word:Psycholinguistics.
Interested in hearing more if you will.
I’m actually in the middle of reading :’The Handbook of Psycholinguistics.’ It’s about how humans process language. It’s a branch of cognitive psychology.
Language is being weaponized and can affect you just like images, subliminally.
I am in no doubt of this. Just wishing to streamline as I’m studying a great deal simultaneously.
I would add: research shows that language actually shapes our mind individually and collectively.
Look at what is happening with the gender pronouns. This isnt a question of sexual identity, they want to push this agenda because it is changing individual and collective psyches: how we see the world and how we react to it.
Despite 7000 or 8000 different languages, kids acquire the exact same level of proficiency at 5 and follow the same stages. Whatever their social/economic environment.
Why is that?
Because language is innate and necessary to process information at the brain level (communication is not its most important role contrary to what we think).
There are also hypothesis that linguistics may play a role at quantum levels.
You may want to read on Noham Chomsky works.