in

"Woman of our Times" in Summertown, Oxford

“A moving graphic representation of modern femininity. “

What do you think?

25 Points
Upvote Downvote
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
18 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
valhalla
valhalla
1 month ago

Who wants to go knock this thing over

Mina
Mina
1 month ago

They really said “Let’s create something to represent modern day femininity” and then just slapped a p***s on it. Disgusting.

confederacy_of_dunces
confederacy_of_dunces
1 month ago

If any statue needs to be pulled down by a mob and pushed into a river its this one

thursdayafternoon
thursdayafternoon
1 month ago

Baphomet.

PiscesMarie
PiscesMarie
1 month ago

We can all agree that gross monstrosity is no woman. Please someone vandalize it, this thing has no right to exist.

Allonzykoi
Allonzykoi
1 month ago

How in the world could you pretend that this is beautiful ? To me, art is supposed to represent the beauty or the mysteries of the world. This, on the other hand, is just degenerate.

pau
pau
1 month ago

it’s in The Hague, Netherlands

Andy
Andy
1 month ago

Apparently it’s not Oxford but an older statue in Netherlands

Matt
Matt
1 month ago

extra third arm may be showing the hidden force

Oliver Wilkening
Oliver Wilkening
1 month ago

“S**t of our times”. Tear it off. That’s what the BLMutants are doing with REAL monuments, too.

Francisco Gomollon
Francisco Gomollon
29 days ago

Where is that statue, some are saying its not in Oxford but in the Hague..

Lacy
Lacy
1 month ago

Have you guys never heard of a hermaphrodite? Are we saying anyone born like this is disgusting and a monstrosity? How do you think people who are born like this feel about people saying such mean things about how they look?

Nathan
Nathan
1 month ago
Reply to  Lacy

That’s a really outdated term – they’re generally referred to as intersex today. But you raise a good point.

confederacy_of_dunces
confederacy_of_dunces
1 month ago
Reply to  Lacy

Intersex people generally don’t have three arms or weird cat/beaver creatures on their heads

kittyvac
kittyvac
1 month ago
Reply to  Lacy

The statue is clearly not referring to intersex people when they say ‘of our times’. Intersex people are an inconvenience to their ideology.

scars
scars
1 month ago
Reply to  Lacy

True hermaphrodites are so rare that they might as well be actual unicorns. Disorders of sexual development are still pretty rare, but they primarily involve ambiguous genitals — not a normal sized p***s. There are plenty of men who actually have moobs (either because they’re fat or gynecomastia), but they are still men. NO WOMAN HAS A P***S. She can have an enlarged clitoris that looks vaguely like a tiny p***s (especially if she is a FTM transgender who takes testosterone), but it would never look like this.

Calling this statue a “woman” is misogyny. Full stop. Why do we never see statues of a man with a vagina and breasts titled “a man of our times”? Why do you not see trans “men” stealing trophies from real men or raping men in men’s prisons? Nobody is out chanting “trans men are men”.

It is a movement that supports MEN who say they are women over ACTUAL women. It’s the patriarchy in a dress. Nothing more and nothing less. Any woman who supports this is an absolute idiot and/or attracted to men in dresses.

Oliver Wilkening
Oliver Wilkening
1 month ago
Reply to  Lacy

Real hermaphrodites are so rare that the chance to meet one is extremly small. So this “monument” is totally useless. It has nothing to do with all the so called “trans”people who think an identity disorder is a kind of gender.