“A moving graphic representation of modern femininity. “
in Pics
"Woman of our Times" in Summertown, Oxford
lefruit555
25 Votes
Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.
To use social login you have to agree with the storage and handling of your data by this website. Privacy Policy
AcceptHere you'll find all collections you've created before.
Who wants to go knock this thing over
They really said “Let’s create something to represent modern day femininity” and then just slapped a p***s on it. Disgusting.
If any statue needs to be pulled down by a mob and pushed into a river its this one
Baphomet.
We can all agree that gross monstrosity is no woman. Please someone vandalize it, this thing has no right to exist.
How in the world could you pretend that this is beautiful ? To me, art is supposed to represent the beauty or the mysteries of the world. This, on the other hand, is just degenerate.
Femmy Otten is the creator of this abomination:
https://www.google.com/search?q=Femmy+Otten&client=firefox-b-d&sxsrf=ALiCzsYecXFkKFzlnBgI8LachZ-NTxdqMQ:1653945427584&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi1ncHtkoj4AhVqmIsKHZPBCXkQ_AUoAXoECAEQAw&biw=1252&bih=564&dpr=1.09
it’s in The Hague, Netherlands
Apparently it’s not Oxford but an older statue in Netherlands
extra third arm may be showing the hidden force
“S**t of our times”. Tear it off. That’s what the BLMutants are doing with REAL monuments, too.
Where is that statue, some are saying its not in Oxford but in the Hague..
Have you guys never heard of a hermaphrodite? Are we saying anyone born like this is disgusting and a monstrosity? How do you think people who are born like this feel about people saying such mean things about how they look?
That’s a really outdated term – they’re generally referred to as intersex today. But you raise a good point.
Intersex people generally don’t have three arms or weird cat/beaver creatures on their heads
The statue is clearly not referring to intersex people when they say ‘of our times’. Intersex people are an inconvenience to their ideology.
True hermaphrodites are so rare that they might as well be actual unicorns. Disorders of sexual development are still pretty rare, but they primarily involve ambiguous genitals — not a normal sized p***s. There are plenty of men who actually have moobs (either because they’re fat or gynecomastia), but they are still men. NO WOMAN HAS A P***S. She can have an enlarged clitoris that looks vaguely like a tiny p***s (especially if she is a FTM transgender who takes testosterone), but it would never look like this.
Calling this statue a “woman” is misogyny. Full stop. Why do we never see statues of a man with a vagina and breasts titled “a man of our times”? Why do you not see trans “men” stealing trophies from real men or raping men in men’s prisons? Nobody is out chanting “trans men are men”.
It is a movement that supports MEN who say they are women over ACTUAL women. It’s the patriarchy in a dress. Nothing more and nothing less. Any woman who supports this is an absolute idiot and/or attracted to men in dresses.
Real hermaphrodites are so rare that the chance to meet one is extremly small. So this “monument” is totally useless. It has nothing to do with all the so called “trans”people who think an identity disorder is a kind of gender.