The painting by painter Henry Gillard Glindoni representing Occultist John Dee performing an experiment in front of Queen Elizabeth l actually hides a mysterious secret- skulls when x-rayed.
SOURCE HERE
in Pics
The painting by painter Henry Gillard Glindoni representing Occultist John Dee performing an experiment in front of Queen Elizabeth l actually hides a mysterious secret- skulls when x-rayed
deletetheelite
37 Votes
Always hiding in plain sight. Amazing find Deletetheelite
It appears as though the image of John Dee is looking at the skulls when performing his ritual.
Are those numbers or letters in the upper right of the X-ray image, or am I seeing something caused by the color distortion of the X-ray?
It is an Igigi. The Watchers. The Grey ones.
I put a few filters on the John Dee’s couldron fire to bring out what was there. Looks like some type of person or demon standing there. You can see the head and body.
Way too artifacted to tell anything for sure.
Very pixelated, but it appears to be the typical fire priest with the bird mask. This occult practice was popularised Phrygian bird oracles of Cybele:Kybele in Anatolia (modern Turkey), who were eunuchs called Gallae (like the urigallus of Babylon before them.)
The history of their inclusion into the “Christian” church by Saul of Tarshish (Solar seeker of the six), is found in the texts of Gall-Atians. They later found their way into dominating the Catholic priesthood of Constantine, who killed his own mother at their behest (like King James after him, the killing of the mother being required for monarchs entrance into priestly manners, which was called “putting on mothers clothes.”) Many of the practices of the Roman Catholic, and even more so the Eastern Orthodox, clergy are directly through this cult, including Mary being called “Queen of Heaven.”
This cult of Galatians practiced ritual orgies that involved self castrations as an act of reverence to Ky-Ba’al, the “Queen of Heaven,” the word Ky meaning “(Celestial) Cycles,” and Bel/Ba’al being “master/lord.” Yeshua mentions this vile practice in Matthew 19:12, when he references “those made eunuchs by others.”
Their real origins are found in Gaul, the old Celtic empires of haplogroup R1 (particularly r1b the Hanachs) and Druidic nature cults.
Their practices are memorialised as the “seat of Satan,” in Revelations 2:13 when Yeshua mentions Pergamum.
Here are some resources on this cult. So many of the things we see in religion and media today come directly through here, itself coming from the cult of Innana, that coming from the original cults of The Great Mother and fire ecstasy. This is why Catholic priests are essentially child loving eunuchs, as they are carrying out the same practices as the Phrygian bird eunuchs.
Phrygian itself being of the same root as phara-on and Phar-I-see, FIRE. They worship Prometheus/Agni second only to the great mother. The first beast, the solar man of many faces, revived by the second, the great mother Queen of heaven (her two horns of the moon, and the mouth of the dragon being the north node, always called the dragons head/mouth in antiquity.)
s3.amazonaws.com/arena-attachments/539632/d6348aa09f4510eb5704b6da501f9e7d.pdf
jstor.org/stable/27643268
academia.edu/48737692/The_Ideology_of_the_Eunuch_Priest
Notice the name for mother is “Matar/madar” in the picture below, which means “to kill” in Latin and Hebrew. It is the same root as Martyr and Murder in English, as well as Mother. This connection coming from the Martyring Murder of the Mother.
Murder = aMERoDAR who is MAR-DUK. The sun king, the first beast man of many faces.
And by the martyring murder of the mother, the man of many faces may put on mother’s clothes… the second beast revived the image of the first.
This is why all of the embodiments of the antiXristos, who twist and obfuscate The Truth of YHWH, who is Yeshua, murder their mothers. Constantine (formed Catholicism) King James (formed the KJV and Church of England), and now Yeezy (formed the cult of Ye)… this is the man of many faces the antiXristos manifesting across the age to deceive even the elect of possible.
And this is why the church calls itself “the bride of Christ.” Because per typical chiral inversion, Christ is the man (Osiris), and the church is the woman (Isis.)
The church martyr murders the mother, the Queen of Heaven, and then puts on mother’s clothes. They venerate Mary as The Queen of heaven, but then remove the female aspect from YHWH (which itself genderizes, or creates false duality, of the ineffable creator.)
By murdering Cybele, the magna mater, and cutting off their male genitalia, they have become her, they have “put on mothers clothes.”
This is why I am very harsh regarding this doctrine, as it is borne directly from Phrygia and Luciferian bird priests of Innana/Cybele, not Yeshua.
This doctrine appears with Freud, who postulated the complex as basic to all male children of humanity. This itself an attempt to use male humanity for the ends of the “magna mater,” embodying Lucifer her “Son/Sun,” as king here.
Of note is that Oedipus the story is incorrectly taught now. If we read the original Greek, it is clear Oedipus is used by his mother as a long sacrifice, whose father rapes a young boy. She representing the magna mater knowingly marries her son, by tricking him, in order to “save the city,” that is keep the Qarat (the bricks in the wall the Kerata, the horns,) in order. And thus slays Apep/Tiamat the dragon of chaos.
Anyone wishing to know the real story of Oedipus without rereading all of the Greek, there is a French book available which is good to read called:
Oedipe n’est pa coupable
It’s unbelievable how English language is coded…. are there any words not related to dragons? Everything seems to be an unaware calling to lucifer etc. What hit me the most was word “happy”. Funny thing, this is my least favourite word in English – always wondered why. Now i know. Also, how i can call a womam whom gave me birth? If calling her “mother” mean something else, how i should call her? By her name? Amd how to call the man who raised me? Not father but how?
Thank you as always
There is an important concept to understand: they have twisted all of The Truth. Calling your mother, mother harkens back to the very earliest of language. That they have incorporated murder and martyr into a grotesque luciferian practice doesn’t make the word “mother,” unusable.
There are certain examples such as the use of the word God for the name of the ineffable creator which are pure inversions and should be avoided, but these are more exceptions than rules. Speaking with intention and understanding is more helpful in discerning than to play minesweeper with words like mother.
The Word is an excellent tool in tracing human history and practices, but should not create fear in your speech.
Will AI be defeated by some sort of solar flare or powerful electromagnetic wave that will hit the Earth and the cycle begins again? It seems that we stood no chances against AI but there are few tries we can have, right? Also, did humankind developed AI in the past?
@444gem
@deletetheelite
@deletetheelite…….very interesting! The Renaissance produced many famous artists, yet who were the teachers of these ‘Old World Masters’? More so, many of these paintings, especially portraits, painted their subjects holding odd finger and hand placements…….
…Ex. Leonardo da Vinci’s painting Salvator Mundi (see pic)
@444gem……….Are these beings in the X-ray or in the actual painting or both? 🤔
Best…..
I think this picture is actually of the Antichrist.
Davinci is a well known occultist just as Galileo.
Although I wanted to address the ‘hands and fingers ‘ position of many of these classical paintings, I couldn’t help but think the same thing on this painting as well, mouse!
Many of da Vinci’s works do have very interesting hand/finger placement…….
One wonders about other painters……here’s one from Angelo Bronzino……
I saw faces like these coming through the walls the first time I was hospitalized.
@AE
Interesting AE-LG…..faces like the “igigi” or like the painting of da Vinci’s?
Best…….
The Igigi, or at least they looked very similar, like condensed charcoal-colored smoke in the forms of faces, sometimes parts of the upper bodies. They were coming in through the walls in front of me and some were passing through from one side of a corner out through another. Most of them were smallish in size, like toddlers, but their faces looked older like adults.
When they sat a nurse in with me to “keep an eye on me” (because I wouldn’t/couldn’t sleep for 3 entire days/nights no matter how much they tranquilized me, convinced I would die if I did, they started rifling fingers through the nurse’s hair. I can still see that part clearly. It was almost invisible fingers doing it. I told her and it freaked her out pretty badly, she tried to hold the fort, but left after a few more minutes once I told her about all the other things I was seeing. It’s cool, I was calmer with her gone. She’d been very angry with me, as if I was acting out purposefully just to put her out. She’d been verbally sniping at me and I didn’t want her there to begin with.
One other time, when I first remarried and he “tucked me away” for a year and let me heal, I had screaming nightmares almost every night, and I’d wake, eyes wide open, and still see them coming through the walls, but only one or two at a time, then, and I could make them go away.
@AE-LG
So sorry you had to endure all of that…..it must have been extremely difficult for you……what an ordeal!
Thanks, Ralphie, it was a long time ago but it was very disturbing, most definitely. But at the same time, I didn’t have a full, actual terror, if that makes sense…? I was seeing and observing, and even though it was very trippy (for lack of another word – I’ve only ever tripped on things prescribed) deep inside me I had a core of calm. Probably an unaccountable calm for all that was happening. The really bad feelings came later. Those dreams were far more terrifying to me than anything during either hospitalizations.
@A E
I posted a couple of sources from the US Army regarding telepathic voice message transmission via EM radiation in the Economist and the weird sounds articles.
The igigi, the watchers, are now called “the greys.” I will provide more clarity on this topic soon, need to search for a public source document.
Thanks, Gem. I have to head to work again for the evening, but I will continue to follow. Very grateful.
Please share I have had experiences with the greys they are evil and terrifying. I keep trying to post about it when it’s relevant on here but either VC keeps deleting my posts regarding them or they just won’t come through. But I’ve tried to share my experiences they just never show up when I post here
The painting above is not actually by Davinci, but by his student. However yes, they channeled and buried entities into all of their works. It is much more purposeful on the part of the painter than the photographer today.
I’ve been practicing your mirror technique and was wondering if I can make a post on one that I did, pretty interesting find
For sure Delete! I’m not a Qayin/Kain possessor. I’m just incredibly grateful I could offer you some help in finding Truth.
Lol! Just being respectful, thanks!
First time i hear about these creatures.
Could you recommend literature to explore this topic?
@mouse @TinyAmazon
One of the best resources that explains the relationship between the IGigi, the Greys/watchers, and the extraterrestrial phenomena is:
The Secret Rituals of The Men in Black by Allen H. Greenfield.
It can be found here:
/avalonlibrary.net/ebooks/Allen%20H.%20Greenfield%20-%20Secret%20Rituals%20of%20the%20Men%20in%20Black.pdf
whoaaa who wud have thought, imagine what other pictures cud be hiding
I forgot the source, but John Dee was the original 007.
Yep, he would sign his confidential letters to the Queen with “007”
Source: https://blog.bookstellyouwhy.com/the-first-james-bond-john-dee-was-the-original-007
Any painter will tell you that sometimes you will paint something in and it just isn’t right so you paint it out. Back in those days art was commissioned and the queen may not have been happy with skulls round her feet.
That said…that’s what they want us to think. Let’s face it they write history.
If you read the article, the painter actually lived in the Victorian Era. Which means this was painted somewhere between the late 1800s to early 1900s. This was hundreds of years after Queen Elizabeth I”s time and therefore was not commissioned by her. The article does mention that Victorian Era artists had an obsession with skulls and death.