Jeff Younger, of Texas, is desperately attempted to block his ex-wife Dr. Anne Georgulas from chemically castrating their son, James, nine.
Don't have an account? Register
Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.
Here you'll find all collections you've created before.
I’ve seen this story everywhere. It is heartbreaking. Apparently the young boy had a twin brother who is so confused by all that is happening. Not only is the boy himself being traumatized but his twin as well. These poor babies. Reminds me of the Reimer(?) twins with John Money.
A trend seems to be that women are more deceived by this overall than men are. The men appear to be playing women societally using emotionality and “compassion” in cold, calculated manners, to gain consent. But these women cannot be all blind. Some seem to be more vicious than the men.
I am convinced some of it is the simple power play shown in media – the women are always “right” in relationships, even when they are plainly hypocritical and wrong (and the men are hobbled from explaining the big truth that would totally explain the rationality of why they did what they did).
Regular women feel this need to be “normal” and always right. (What does media say now, “We all need to see ourselves onscreen.”
Much like the 80’s-90’s really hit hard on the “kids are way smarter than their oblivious parents” theme, which worked its wonders.
Which would make sense due to the emotionality component.
Men calculate, then act for their own ends.
Women do as well, but they feel on different levels and rarely forget and often hold intense grudges which manifest in different ways…passive aggressive being the least immediately obvious and the most difficult to prove or defend against. Is this a power play for them? A type of revenge against men who’ve wronged them?
These poor boys.
I don’t think it’s right to generalise here. Terf Island UK is alive and well and it is sad SJWs here that are seeking attention that are transing kids- as it is everywhere else – and that is certainly not all women but a sad minority. Most parents will protect their kids with their life. There is a political element to this agenda so I don’t think it’s fair to tar all women like this.
That said I think some women do act in a way unbecoming to them – but these are just bad people – I don;t feel it’s a sex thing.
I’m not tarring all women, by any means. Many woman are fierce in the protection of children – their own as well as others’.
But the vast, vast majority of articles of this vein I read are of fathers fighting mothers, not the other way around.
This entire issue is fundamentally a sex thing. I think there is a certain type of woman terrified of being “out” of the mainstream “right side of history” ideas and is uniquely manipulable. She is alone, lonely, insecure, very angry and finds validation in a “sisterhood” that has been fabricated from lies and self destruction.
This is so twisted.. how can any mother suggest to their child that it needs to take drugs to be okay? Why can’t a boy play with dolls and stuff and still be a boy? I don’t get how on one side everything is about being gender neutral with children but then on the other hand parents pushing them to take hormon blockers because something isn’t right with their body. Really.. I don’t get it.
These mothers come from a long line of deliberate-agenda-disrupted women/mothers/mothering/parental behavior. Ritualized mother-drugged birthing has been pervasive for a full century, since the 1920s – disconnecting from their babies immediately by chemical & ‘expert-advice’ physical separation following birth; bottle-feeding further disconnects a mother from her baby… by withholding superior nutrition in deference to outside ‘expert advice’ she’s relegating her baby’s needs to invalid; exiling a newborn/ infant/toddler to sleep far away from mother’s body is yet another disconnect, as is carrying baby around at arm’s length in a (plastic bucket) container device & pushing it around in a perambulator when out & about. All further blunt/diminish the perfectly-designed & innately-programmed protective instinct of a mother for her infant.
We’ve had parental-theory mind control for just as long to “not spoil the baby”… by depriving it of satisfaction of core Human needs for closeness, empathy & systems’regulation/comfort – as they themselves were also deprived. Women & their babies are deprived of protection & support for effective mothering by the destruction of the family unit. Additionally, women/mothers & babies have lived life for many decades/generations in a heavily/severely petro-chem-contaminated environment; many if not most chemicals released into the air/water/soil/food/’meds’/manufacturing processes are hormone disruptive & neurotoxic, which weakens & degrades Human beings’ abilities & capacities to function congruently.
For a very long time, most have been taught/coerced to ‘trust the experts’ & ‘improve on nature’ by this kind of trauma-based mind control… and most do, so this is just another iteration of deliberate degradation of children by degraded mothers.
“It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society.”
~ Jiddu Krishnamurti
“Never, no never, did nature say one thing and wisdom another.” ~Johann Christoph Friedrich von Schiller
“Nature…tends to strike back, with the likely victims in this case being vulnerable and impressionable youngsters who, as confused adults, will pay the price for their elders’ fashionable fantasies.” ~ N.T. Wright, Theologian, pointed out to the Times of London
“ Of all the anti-social vested interests, the worst is the vested interest in ill-health. “ ~ George Bernard Shaw (1856-1950)
The documentary Programming the Nation can give some insight, but it really goes way beyond this
Here’s an interview with the filmmaker that links the documentary also
See the blue shirt of the Child with inverted cross 🙁